United States District Court, Southern District of New York
45 F.2d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 1930)
For several years before April 28, 1926, Greene (defendant), a married man, had an affair with another woman (the claimant) (plaintiff). At all times, the claimant knew Greene was married. The parties dispute whether Greene promised to marry the claimant once he divorced his wife. During his relationship with the claimant, Greene paid for many of her expenses, including $70,000 for a house for her to occupy in Long Island, New York. The claimant held all legal title to the house. Greene and the claimant ended their relationship in April 1926 and drafted a written agreement which was placed under seal. The agreement stated that Greene would pay the claimant $1,000 per month during their joint lives, would assign her a $100,000 life insurance policy on his life, would pay her $100,000 in case he lapsed on the life insurance policy premiums, and would pay the rent for four years on an apartment leased by the claimant. The agreement also stated Greene had no interest in the Long Island house, and was not liable for the mortgage interest, taxes, or other property charges. Additionally, the claimant agreed to release Greene from all claims she had against him. In exchange for Greene’s promises in the agreement, the claimant was to pay Greene $1, as well as “other good and valuable considerations.” When Greene declared bankruptcy, the claimant filed a $375,000 claim against his estate based on their written agreement. The estate’s trustee rejected the claim, and the claimant requested a hearing before the referee in bankruptcy. The referee held the claim valid, and the trustee petitioned for review in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Woolsey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.