In re Hall
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
781 F.2d 897 (1986)
Hall filed a patent application on February 27, 1979. A protest of the application was filed, which included a copy of a dissertation by Peter Foldi. Foldi had submitted his dissertation at a university in Germany in September 1977. The patent examiner rejected Hall’s application on account of the printed publication bar under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirmed. Hall appealed on the grounds that the German university did not know the specific date of the publication of Foldi’s dissertation. A representative for the university did state that the dissertation was sent to the university’s library on November 4, 1977, and therefore the dissertation was “most probably available for general use toward the beginning of the month of December, 1977.”
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baldwin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.