In re Hawai'i Electric Light Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
526 P.3d 329 (2023)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Hu Honua (plaintiff) was an energy company. Hu Honua applied to Hawaii’s Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for regulatory approval to build a biomass-fueled power plant to provide electricity to Hawaii Island. Hu Honua advocated that this plant would be better than fossil-fueled plants because the biomass fuel for this plant would be obtained by burning trees, a renewable resource. However, this mass tree burning would create significant greenhouse-gas emissions, which were known to have a negative impact on the environment. Hu Honua claimed the plant would be carbon-negative and argued this positive feature would offset the negative impact of the plant’s greenhouse-gas emissions. The PUC denied the application, finding that the greenhouse-gas emissions were too high relative to other renewable-energy options. Hu Honua appealed the administrative denial to the Hawaii Supreme Court, arguing that the PUC had improperly compared its proposal to other renewable-energy sources instead of just fossil-fueled power plants and had made its factual findings improperly.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eddins, J.)
Concurrence (Wilson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 921,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


