In re Herbst

469 B.R. 299 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Herbst

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
469 B.R. 299 (2012)

Facts

Jason Herbst (debtor) executed a security agreement for property with Talmer Bank & Trust (the bank) (creditor). The security agreement gave the bank a possessory interest in the property and provided that in the event of default the bank could repossess the property and sell it as a means of satisfying Herbst’s debt. Herbst defaulted on the security agreement, and the bank commenced judicial proceedings in state court to seize and sell the property. Pursuant to a state court order, the bank seized Herbst’s property and placed it with an auction house. After the bank seized the property, but before it was sold, Herbst filed for bankruptcy in federal court. This action commenced an automatic stay of all collection proceedings against Herbst as the debtor, including the bank’s repossession of the property. Despite this, the bank refused to return the property to Herbst’s bankruptcy estate. The bank maintained that because it had seized the property before Herbst filed for bankruptcy, the automatic stay did not apply to its seizure of the property, and consequently, it did not need to return the property to Herbst’s bankruptcy estate. Herbst filed a motion for a return of the property.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership