From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
In re Highland Construction Management Services, LP
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
497 B.R. 829 (2013)
Wells Fargo, N.A. f/b/o Jerome Guyant IRA (Guyant) (creditor) loaned Highland Construction Management Services, L.P. (Highland) (debtor) over $1 million beginning on December 22, 2005. The loan was secured by Highland’s interest in a pair of Virginia limited-liability companies, and a financing statement was filed on October 11, 2006. Highland filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on February 28, 2011. Guyant did not file a continuation statement, and, according to Virginia law, the financing statement lapsed on October 10, 2011, with no other liens being filed against the collateral. Virginia Code §8.9A-515 provided that a filed financing statement lapses after five years, unless a continuation statement is filed. On lapse, the financing statement ceases to be effective, and the security interest in question becomes unperfected and is then “deemed never to have been perfected as against a purchaser of the collateral for value.” Highland, as debtor-in-possession, argued that the financing statement had lapsed and become ineffective and that Guyant’s security interest was unperfected. Highland would then hold priority itself, because it would be construed as a hypothetical lien creditor as of the date of filing of the bankruptcy petition, similar to the treatment given a bankruptcy trustee. Guyant argued that the termination did not impact its priority position regarding the collateral. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found that the statute was ambiguous in that reasonable people could disagree as to the meaning of same. The court sustained an objection of Highland to the secured status of Guyant’s proof of claim. Guyant filed a motion for reconsideration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mayer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.