In re Kutner

399 N.E.2d 963 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Kutner

Illinois Supreme Court
399 N.E.2d 963 (1979)

Facts

Attorney Luis Kutner (defendant) was retained to represent Warren P. Fisher in relation to a charge of criminal battery. Kutner charged Fisher a fixed $5,000 fee for his services. On Fisher’s court date, the charges against Fisher were dropped. Fisher then consulted other attorneys who told Fisher that Kutner had overcharged him. Fisher filed a complaint with the Chicago Bar Association, which referred the matter to the Committee on Professional Fees. The administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (administrator) (plaintiff) charged Kutner with a violation of Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility for overcharging. During the hearing, an expert witness testified that the typical fee for a simple battery case like Fisher’s was between $750 and $1,250 based on the number of hours needed to pursue the case, even if the case went to trial. In his defense, Kutner argued that the agreement with Fisher was a fixed-fee agreement and that the case had to be resolved as a contractual dispute rather than a disciplinary inquiry. Despite Kutner’s representations that he spent 10 hours working on the case, the review board found that Kutner spent five to six hours on the matter and had overcharged Fisher in violation of the state’s rules of professional responsibility. The review board recommended censure of Kutner. Kutner appealed the recommendations of the review board to the Illinois Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Underwood, J.)

Dissent (Clark, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership