In re M. Paolella & Sons, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
161 B.R. 107 (1993)
![CS](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/190/Carolyn_Strutton.webp)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
M. Paolella & Sons, Inc. (Paolella) (debtor) was a wholesale distributor of tobacco products. Tobacco companies (creditors) shipped inventory to Paolella. Paolella paid for the goods after they were received. Paolella had a financing agreement with MNC Commercial Corp. that provided a line of credit secured by virtually all of Paolella’s assets, including its inventory. MNC became concerned about Paolella’s solvency and began making plans with Paolella in May 1985 to liquidate its assets. MNC planned to complete liquidation by January 1986. MNC closely monitored all of Paolella’s current and incoming inventory. The tobacco companies offered a special buying program in December 1985 that offered Paolella almost $2 million more in inventory during January 1986 than during a typical month. Paolella participated in the special buying program with MNC auditing all of the incoming inventory throughout January 1986. At the end of January, MNC stopped advancing funds to honor Paolella’s checks, notified Paolella it was in default, and requested possession of all of the collateral securing the loan including the new inventory. The tobacco companies filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against Paolella. The tobacco companies petitioned the bankruptcy court for reclamation of the inventory. The bankruptcy judge upheld the tobacco companies’ claim, finding that MNC’s conduct was not in good faith. MNC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Broderick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.