In re Marriage of Noghrey
Court of Appeal of California
215 Cal. Rptr. 153 (1985)
Kambiz Noghrey (defendant) and Farima Noghrey (plaintiff) entered into an antenuptial agreement on the day of their wedding. The agreement provided that in the event of a divorce, Kambiz would give Farima a house that he owned in Sunnyvale, California, as well as the greater of $500,000 or one-half of his assets. Seven-and-a-half months after their wedding, Farima filed for divorce, claiming the existence and terms of the written agreement and requesting that the terms be enforced. The trial court bifurcated the divorce hearing from the hearing on the validity of the antenuptial agreement. Although the physical agreement could not be located, the trial court heard evidence as to its existence, execution and terms. The trial court held that the agreement existed and was enforceable. Kambiz appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Foley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.