In re Mullins & Pritchard, Inc.

549 So. 2d 872 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Mullins & Pritchard, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal
549 So. 2d 872 (1989)

Facts

Mullins & Pritchard, Inc. (Mullins) (plaintiff) owned and operated hydrocarbon-production facilities. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) inspectors received complaints regarding discharges from Mullins’s hydrocarbon-production facilities. Based on a complaint, DEQ inspectors found numerous illegal discharges. The DEQ inspector testified that no one was at the site during the inspections, so he could not provide the owner with split samples, as was the usual DEQ inspection procedure. The DEQ hearing officer found Mullins guilty of violating numerous regulatory provisions and DEQ’s notification procedures. The DEQ hearing officer also found that Mullins failed to clean up and dispose of the discharged oil-field waste properly. The DEQ hearing officer assessed penalties against Mullins for impermissible oil discharges and other wastes at its oil-field production facilities. Mullins sought review in the Louisiana Court of Appeal. Mullins asserted numerous challenges to the rulings, including a challenge to the constitutionality of La. R.S. 30:2012. The statute authorized warrantless inspection of facilities subject to environmental regulations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foil, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership