In re Mullins & Pritchard, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
549 So. 2d 872 (1989)
- Written by Oni Harton, JD
Facts
Mullins & Pritchard, Inc. (Mullins) (plaintiff) owned and operated hydrocarbon-production facilities. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) inspectors received complaints regarding discharges from Mullins’s hydrocarbon-production facilities. Based on a complaint, DEQ inspectors found numerous illegal discharges. The DEQ inspector testified that no one was at the site during the inspections, so he could not provide the owner with split samples, as was the usual DEQ inspection procedure. The DEQ hearing officer found Mullins guilty of violating numerous regulatory provisions and DEQ’s notification procedures. The DEQ hearing officer also found that Mullins failed to clean up and dispose of the discharged oil-field waste properly. The DEQ hearing officer assessed penalties against Mullins for impermissible oil discharges and other wastes at its oil-field production facilities. Mullins sought review in the Louisiana Court of Appeal. Mullins asserted numerous challenges to the rulings, including a challenge to the constitutionality of La. R.S. 30:2012. The statute authorized warrantless inspection of facilities subject to environmental regulations.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Foil, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.