In re Nassau County Strip Search Cases

461 F.3d 219 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Nassau County Strip Search Cases

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
461 F.3d 219 (2006)

Facts

The Nassau County Correctional Center (correctional center) (defendant) employed a blanket policy pursuant to which it strip searched all newly admitted misdemeanor detainees. After precedent was established that the policy violated detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights, a group of misdemeanor detainees who had been strip searched pursuant to the policy (detainees) (plaintiffs) sued, seeking class certification. After protracted litigation, the proposed plaintiffs’ class narrowed its request for certification to two issues: (1) whether the policy existed and (2) whether the correctional center was liable for implementing it. The correctional center subsequently conceded liability for implementing the policy. Because of the correctional center’s concession, the district court eliminated the issue of liability from its predominance analysis. The court then declined to certify the class, concluding that individual issues outweighed common issues in the matter because some detainees had been strip searched pursuant to reasonable suspicion regardless of the blanket policy. The detainees appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Straub, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership