In re Negusie
Board of Immigration Appeals
27 I. & N. Dec. 347 (2018)
- Written by Eric DiVito, JD
Facts
Negusie (plaintiff) was a citizen of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Negusie testified that he was forced to join the Eritrean military but that he refused to fight against fellow Ethiopians. For this refusal, Negusie was incarcerated for two years. Once released from prison, Negusie was forced to serve as a guard at a prison camp operated by the Eritrean military. Negusie guarded prisoners who were not allowed to shower or get fresh air, and who were sometimes placed in the hot sun as a form of punishment. Negusie identified two occasions on which he disobeyed orders so that he could assist prisoners. Negusie was reprimanded for doing so. Negusie escaped to the United States as a stowaway aboard a boat. Negusie’s application for asylum and withholding of removal was denied, but his request for deferral of removal was granted. The Board of Immigration Appeals denied appeals from both Negusie and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (defendant). The case was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court and remanded back to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.