In re Omega Trust
New Hampshire Supreme Court
281 A.3d 1281 (2022)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Mark Douglas created a revocable inter vivos trust titled the Omega Trust as part of his estate plan. The trust stated that Douglas could amend the trust “by filing notice of such revocation, modification, change, or withdrawal with the Trustee” and that the amendment “shall be effective when executed by [Douglas].” Twice, Douglas followed the procedures listed in the trust to formally amend its terms. In poor health, Douglas decided to amend the trust a third time to change the successor trustees, add new beneficiaries, and make other changes. Douglas emailed his attorney regarding these intended changes. The attorney asked some questions and then emailed Douglas a summary of the proposed changes, noting that the firm was ready to prepare the formal amendment documents. Douglas responded, “Very nice job, there are just a few suggested changes as noted below.” The attorney replied that the firm would finalize the formal amendment document with those requested changes. Two days later, Douglas died without having signed a formal third amendment. David Apostoloff (plaintiff), a trust beneficiary, filed a petition in state court to have the email exchange declared a valid amendment to the Omega Trust. The Omega Trust’s trustee (defendant) moved to dismiss the petition, arguing the trust’s stated amendment method was exclusive and the emails did not comply with that method. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the petition. Apostoloff appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hantz Marconi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

