From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Christopher Thomas Kalla
Minnesota Supreme Court
811 N.W.2d 576 (2012)
Lawyer Christopher Kalla (defendant) represented two clients: Client A, a home purchaser, and Client B, a realtor and businessowner. In 2006, Client B helped Client A purchase Client A’s home and connected Client A to an individual lender. Client A borrowed money from the lender to afford the down payment. Client B’s company, Future Mortgage, arranged a mortgage that secured Client A’s loan. In 2007, Kalla filed a usury lawsuit against the lender on behalf of Client A. The lender’s answer and counterclaim to Client A’s lawsuit identified Future Mortgage as the broker of the loan. Kalla later filed a second usury lawsuit against the lender on behalf of Client B. Kalla did not notify Client B before filing Client B’s lawsuit that Client B or Future Mortgage were mentioned in Client A’s lawsuit. Before the lender brought Client B and Future Mortgage into Client A’s lawsuit as third-party defendants, the lender’s attorney informed Kalla that a conflict of interest would arise between Client A and Client B. After receiving the lender’s third-party complaint, Kalla asked Clients A and B to sign conflict-of-interest waivers. Client A signed the waiver, but Client B did not. Nevertheless, Kalla continued to represent both clients. In 2010, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (plaintiff) filed a disciplinary petition alleging that Kalla’s actions constituted an impermissible conflict of interest. After a hearing, a referee determined that Kalla’s conflict of interest violated the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, and the referee recommended a public reprimand and two years of supervised probation. The Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed the referee’s recommendation.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.