In re Pierce Subdivision Application
Supreme Court of Vermont
965 A.2d 468, 184 Vt. 365 (2008)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
The neighbor (plaintiff) of an applicant (defendant) for a proposed planned residential development (PRD) appealed to the environmental court the planning commission’s approval of the PRD. The neighbor argued that (1) the applicant’s plans did not reveal compliance with the definition of a PRD in the applicable zoning bylaws, (2) the planning commission improperly calculated the allowable density, (3) the bylaws delegated standardless discretion to the planning commission, and (4) the PRD failed to meet minimum-lot-size requirements. The environmental court rejected the neighbor’s arguments. The neighbor appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burgess, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.