In re Project Orange Associates, LLC

431 B.R. 363 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Project Orange Associates, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
431 B.R. 363 (2010)

Facts

General Electric (creditor) supplied gas turbines to Project Orange Associates, LLC (Project Orange) (debtor). A dispute over turbine maintenance led to a $4.1 million arbitration award for General Electric. Later, Project Orange filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Confirmation of the arbitration award was stayed, the turbine dispute remained unresolved, and General Electric became Project Orange’s largest unsecured creditor. Project Orange sought to employ DLA Piper LLP as general bankruptcy counsel. The United States trustee objected to this choice because DLA Piper also provided ongoing legal representation to General Electric entities. DLA Piper retained Golenbock Eisenman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP (Golenbock) as special counsel to handle matters in which a conflict of interest would prevent DLA Piper from adequately representing Project Orange. DLA Piper submitted its employment application to the bankruptcy court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glenn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership