In re Red Mountain Machinery Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona
448 B.R. 1 (2011)
Red Mountain Machinery Company (Red Mountain) (debtor) was a machine-rental business owned and operated by Owen and Linda Cowling. Red Mountain had financed its operations through lines of credit with Comerica Bank (Comerica) (creditor). After many successful years, Red Mountain’s business declined and the company filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. At the time of the filing, Red Mountain owed Comerica approximately $33,000,000. Red Mountain’s proposed reorganization plan gave the Cowlings 100 percent of the equity in the reorganized company in exchange for $480,000 in cash and a $1,250,000 loan. Comerica objected to the plan, arguing that the plan violated the absolute-priority rule and failed to satisfy the new-value corollary.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Haines, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.