In re Schwass

378 B.R. 859 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Schwass

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California
378 B.R. 859 (2007)

Facts

Mary Schwass (plaintiff) borrowed from Pacific Capital Bancorp d/b/a Santa Barbara Bank & Trust (Pacific) to purchase a vehicle. Schwass granted a security interest in the vehicle to Pacific. Schwass filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy and included a statement of intention to reaffirm the debt to Pacific. Pacific’s counsel asked Schwass’s counsel to prepare the reaffirmation agreement. Schwass’s counsel replied that it was not Schwass’s obligation to prepare the agreement, but he would do so for a fee payable by Pacific. Pacific responded that preparing the agreement was Schwass’s responsibility. No reaffirmation agreement was filed within the 30-day period following Schwass’s filing for bankruptcy. Pacific moved for relief from the automatic stay, claiming that Schwass failed to timely follow through on the intent to reaffirm.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bowie, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership