In re Search of 3817 W. West End, First Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60621

321 F. Supp. 2d 953 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Search of 3817 W. West End, First Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60621

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
321 F. Supp. 2d 953 (2004)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

The government applied for a search warrant for the residence of someone who was believed to be engaged in tax fraud in connection with the preparation and filing of federal income tax returns for others. The government sought authority to seize any computers found in the home before conducting an on-site search of their contents. The court authorized the government to seize any computers found at the residence but required the government to provide a protocol of how it would conduct the subsequent search to ensure that the search was reasonably designed to find documents related to the alleged tax fraud and would not consist of a random or general examination of a computer’s contents. Four days later, the government advised the court that the search had been conducted and a computer had been seized. The government requested that the court permit the government to search the computer without providing a protocol. The court denied the request, and the government filed a motion for reconsideration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schenkier, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership