In re Steven G.

210 Conn. 435, 556 A.2d 131 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Steven G.

Connecticut Supreme Court
210 Conn. 435, 556 A.2d 131 (1989)

Facts

The state (plaintiff) charged Steven G. (defendant) with robbery in the second degree in connection to a robbery in a natural-food store. The trial commenced with the direct examination of a witness to the robbery, and after the counsel for Steven G. completed its cross-examination, the state asked for and was granted a continuance. After the trial recommenced and after providing notice to Steven G. and his counsel, the state sought to amend the juvenile delinquency to add four additional charges related to the underlying robbery under Practice Book Section 1029. Over the objection of Steven G., the trial court permitted the state to amend the petition and dismissed Steven G.’s motion to dismiss the four additional charges. The trial court adjudicated Steven G. delinquent, and Steven G. appealed the trial-court judgment to the Connecticut Appellate Court. The appellate court held the appropriate standard governing the mid-trial amendment of a juvenile-delinquency petition was the fundamental-fairness standard rather than the stricter standard used in adult criminal trials. The appellate court upheld the trial court’s judgment, and Steven G. appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glass, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership