In re Thirteen Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
56 F.3d 295 (1995)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
After a fire destroyed the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel, more than 270 tort cases were consolidated in a common-fund case. The district court assigned certain attorneys to serve on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC). The PSC managed the big picture, while the individually retained plaintiffs’ attorneys (IRPAs) handled client communication and all damages issues. After the cases settled for a combined total of $220 million, the district court designated $68 million for attorney’s fees. The district court apportioned the $68 million between the PSC and the IRPAs using the lodestar method, and a group of attorneys from both groups appealed. The First Circuit held that the allocation was flawed and reversed. On remand, the district court used the percentage-of-fund method and awarded 70 percent to the PSC and 30 percent to the IRPAs. A group of IRPAs filed a second appeal and argued that the district abused its discretion because the lodestar method should have been used.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.