In re Transporter Marine, Inc.

217 F.3d 335 (2000)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Transporter Marine, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
217 F.3d 335 (2000)

AR

Facts

Eroica Hall, a seaman on the M/V Transporter, lost both legs in a shipboard accident. The Coast Guard (plaintiff) instituted administrative proceedings against Transporter Marine, Inc. (Transporter) (defendant) for allegedly failing to comply with the Coast Guard’s regulations concerning drug and alcohol testing of involved seamen after a serious marine incident. Transporter obtained an order from the district court finding that the Limitation of Liability Act covered the accident. Transporter then claimed that the Coast Guard’s claims for fines and penalties under its drug-and-alcohol-testing regulations were also covered by the act. The Coast Guard countered that its regulations were regulatory in nature and not the kind of damage claims subject to the act. The Coast Guard also argued that the regulatory violations were temporally remote from the accident. The court ruled in the Coast Guard’s favor and found that the act did not apply to the Coast Guard’s claims. Transporter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership