From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
In re Trico Iron Co., L.L.C.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
282 B.R. 318 (2002)
Trico Iron Company, L.L.C. (Trico) (defendant) contracted with Cargill Incorporated (plaintiff) to purchase 35,000 tons of iron. Under the agreement, Cargill initially purchased the iron from a third party in Brazil and arranged for it to be shipped to New Orleans. The contract declared that the iron was to be delivered to “Destination New Orleans CIFFO.” Title to the iron passed from Cargill to Trico once the iron arrived in New Orleans, but Trico did not have physical possession of the iron at this point. Rather, Trico arranged to have independent intermediaries—called stevedores—transport the iron from New Orleans to Trico’s facility in Decatur via barges. Trico was responsible for the freight charges involved in this transportation. Trico was also responsible for loading the iron in New Orleans and unloading it in Decatur. Trico also assumed the risk of loss of the iron once it reached New Orleans. However, the stevedores did not act as Trico’s representatives—rather, they were mere intermediaries tasked with physically delivering the iron to Trico in Decatur. While the iron was on its way to Decatur, Trico became insolvent and filed for bankruptcy. In response, Cargill attempted to exercise its right to stop delivery of the iron. Cargill filed an action in bankruptcy court to determine its rights under the contract and moved for summary judgment against Trico, arguing it had the right to refuse delivery of the iron to Trico. Trico, in opposition, argued that the receipt of the iron took place upon its arrival in New Orleans due to the contract’s declaration that the iron was to be delivered to “Destination New Orleans CIFFO.”
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Walrath, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.