In re U.S. Financial Securities Litigation

609 F.2d 411 (1979)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re U.S. Financial Securities Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
609 F.2d 411 (1979)

Facts

Societe Generale De Banque, Colonial Growth, Bank of Toledo, and several other entities (purchasers) (plaintiffs) brought separate lawsuits against U.S. Financial (USF) (defendant) and others, alleging various claims relating to violations of securities laws, common-law fraud, and negligence. The individual lawsuits were filed in five different federal judicial districts, but because the cases all shared common issues and allegations, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all the cases to the Southern District of California for consolidated proceedings. After the transfer and consolidation, the district court struck all demands for jury trial from the cases on the grounds that the issues presented were too complex to be fairly decided by a jury, and thus fell within an exception to the Seventh Amendment right to jury trial. Several of the parties sought interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

Dissent (Kilkenny, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership