In re Voboril
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
2017 WL 1048041 (2017)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Stephen Voboril (debtor) filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee asserted his strong-arm power to avoid transfers of Voboril’s property that were not properly perfected under state law. Such a power allows the trustee to avoid prebankruptcy transactions; in this case, the prebankruptcy transaction was a lien that was argued to be unperfected. The trustee argued that liens asserted by First Bank Financial Centre (First Bank) (creditor) in regard to two pieces of property had not been properly perfected and could be avoided. Specifically, Voboril had executed a security agreement giving First Bank a security interest in a promissory note and insurance-renewal commissions. First Bank then filed a financing statement but placed Voboril’s name in the incorrect box on the form, listing “Stephen R. Voboril” as an organization name and not an individual name. While the financing statement was entered into the Wisconsin state database, a search request using Voboril’s name as an individual would not locate First Bank’s financing statement. The relevant Wisconsin law provided that a financing statement was not effective if it was rendered seriously misleading by errors or omissions such that it failed to provide the name of the debtor unless a search under the filing office’s system using the correct name would disclose the financing statement. The trustee argued that because a search of Voboril’s name as an individual returned no result, the financing statement was misleading and ineffective. First Bank argued that because a search of Voboril’s name as an organization would locate the financing statement, it was not misleading or ineffective.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.