In re Yacavino

494 A.2d 801 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Yacavino

New Jersey Supreme Court
494 A.2d 801 (1985)

Facts

Robert C. Yacavino (defendant) was admitted to the bar in 1974. In 1980 Yacavino entered private practice, and in 1981 he began working for a law firm. The law firm took over the practice of a retiring attorney in Pompton Plains, New Jersey, and assigned Yacavino to work out of that office. For a year, Yacavino worked alone with virtually no supervision. The firm’s partners rarely visited the Pompton Plains office. During that time, Yacavino began working on an adoption matter for a client who was previously represented by the retired attorney. Yacavino failed to take action on the adoption matter and created fake orders to make the client believe that he was working on the matter. Although Yacavino did not take these actions for purposes of self-enrichment, charges were brought against Yacavino for violating disciplinary rules, and the Disciplinary Review Board (board) (plaintiff) recommended that Yacavino be suspended from legal practice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership