In the Matter of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., J. Stephan Putnam and David Lee Ullom

Initial Decision Release No. 296 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., J. Stephan Putnam and David Lee Ullom

Securities and Exchange Commission
Initial Decision Release No. 296 (2005)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Stephen Putnam (defendant) was president and chief operating officer of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (RJFS) (defendant), a registered broker-dealer. David Ullom (defendant), who had settled allegations of making false statements to a securities regulator, managed RJFS’s Cranston, Rhode Island, office. Dennis Herula, a Cranston registered representative, was permitted to engage in outside business activities and work off-site. Herula was raising funds for Brite Business Corporation (Brite) and proposed that RJFS participate in a Brite tax strategy. RJFS executives were suspicious and declined to participate. RJFS nevertheless permitted Brite to maintain funds in a brokerage account, purchase $115 million of treasuries on margin at a loss, and propose additional business. Putnam learned that Herula sent unauthorized correspondence to Brite investors on RJFS stationery and told Ullom to monitor Herula’s activities. Putnam did not place Herula on heightened supervision, have Herula’s correspondence reviewed or his office inspected, or follow up to ensure that Ullom was monitoring Herula. RJFS did not regularly inspect off-site locations or have heightened-supervision policies for registered representatives. To ensure compliance, RJFS used audits, monthly branch-manager reports, and suspicious-trade exception reports. Cranston’s auditor was not informed that Herula did business with Brite, sent unauthorized correspondence, and worked off-site. Monthly-report contents were not independently verified. No one followed up on exception reports showing multimillion-dollar transfers between Brite’s and Herula’s wife’s accounts and checks to third parties. Herula and others fraudulently obtained and misappropriated Brite investors’ funds. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) charged RJFS, Putnam, and Ullom with failing to reasonably supervise Herula. Ullom settled. A hearing was held to adjudicate the allegations against RJFS and Putnam.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murray, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership