Independent Bankers Association of New York v. Marine Midland Bank

757 F.2d 453 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Independent Bankers Association of New York v. Marine Midland Bank

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
757 F.2d 453 (1985)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Under the McFadden Act, a national bank could not establish and operate a branch bank in circumstances under which a state-chartered bank would not be permitted to operate a branch bank. Under New York state law (home-office-protection law), a bank could not open a branch bank in any community with a population under 50,000 that already had the home office of another bank. In 1982, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (the comptroller) adopted a regulation regarding the operation of a customer-bank communication terminal (CBCT or automated teller machine) branch. The regulation provided that a CBCT branch was an automated device, established (i.e., owned or rented) by a national bank at an off-premises location that provided certain banking services. Wegmans was a grocery-store chain that installed automated teller machines (ATMs) at dozens of its stores. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (Marine) (defendant) was a national bank. In 1983, Wegmans and Marine agreed to permit Marine depositors to use the ATM located in the Wegmans store in Canandaigua, New York. This ATM was installed by Wegmans and had the Wegmans logo on it. Wegmans was obligated to service and maintain the ATM. Account holders at various financial institutions were permitted to use the ATM. Canandaigua had a population of 11,000 and was the location of Canandaigua National Bank’s home office. The Independent Bankers Association of New York (Bankers Association) and Canandaigua National Bank (plaintiffs) sued Marine, alleging that Marine’s use of the ATM constituted branch banking in violation of the McFadden Act and the home-office-protection law. The district court found that Marine’s use of the ATM constituted impermissible branch banking and enjoined Marine from using the ATM in Wegmans’s Canandaigua store. Marine appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feinberg, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership