Innovation Law Lab v. Nielsen

366 F. Supp. 3d 1110 (2019)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Innovation Law Lab v. Nielsen

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
366 F. Supp. 3d 1110 (2019)

Facts

In 2018, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (defendant) instituted a policy whereby certain aliens entering the country seeking asylum were required to remain in Mexico during the pendency of their removal proceedings. Prior to this policy, aliens applying for asylum at a port of entry on the United States and Mexico border were placed in either expedited or regular removal proceedings. Eleven individuals (plaintiffs) from various South American countries sought asylum in the United States and were returned to Mexico to await removal proceedings. None of the individuals had valid admission documents. The individuals seeking asylum, along with six nonprofit organizations that provided legal services related to immigration issues, filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction preventing the DHS from making the asylum seekers await their removal proceeding in Mexico.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seeborg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership