Inter “K” N.V. v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Arizona Court of Appeals
2011 WL 5826046 (2011)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Inter “K” N.V. (Inter K) (plaintiff) imported numerous cases of cigarettes and transported them to an Arizona warehouse owned by UPS Supply Chain Solutions (UPS) (defendant) to sell to Alfredo Puchi (defendant) for an agreed price of approximately $167,000. During this process, Inter K filled out a customs form, CF 7512, which allowed federal customs officials to supervise the cigarettes during their transit to the warehouse. This form stated that Inter K was the consignee, i.e., recipient, of the cigarettes once they reached the UPS warehouse and listed the warehouse address. Inter K’s attorney later testified that this was done specifically to make it clear that the cigarettes belonged to Inter K unless and until Puchi paid for them. Inter K gave the form to UPS. When the cigarettes arrived at the Arizona warehouse, UPS internally identified Inter K as the owner of the cigarettes. However, Puchi gave UPS a letter stating the cigarettes could be released to him and filled out a different customs form, and UPS released the cigarettes to Puchi without getting approval from Inter K. Puchi then began selling the cigarettes but paid Inter K only $10,000. Inter K sued UPS and Puchi in state court, alleging that they had each breached their respective contracts. After extended litigation, the trial court granted summary judgment to Inter K on its claim against UPS and ordered UPS to pay damages. UPS appealed to the Arizona Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eckerstrom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 914,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

