From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...
International Business Machines Corp. v. Edelstein
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
526 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1975)
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) (plaintiff) filed petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting to be released from the trial judge’s (defendant) requirement that all interviews of adverse witnesses be conducted with either opposing counsel or a stenographer present, so that the transcript would be available for the court to see. The trial judge issued this ruling after the Government, the plaintiff in the underlying case, refused to allow IBM to interview two of its witnesses. Because the order proved to be difficult to implement, IBM requested the writ of mandamus.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.