International Star Class Yacht Racing Association v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc.

80 F.3d 749 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

International Star Class Yacht Racing Association v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
80 F.3d 749 (1996)

  • Written by Ann Wooster, JD

Facts

The International Star Class Yacht Racing Association (ISCYRA) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit corporation that governed and promoted the sport of Star Class yacht racing. ISCYRA owned a trademark in the yachting context for the words “STAR CLASS” used for various yachting products sold by ISCYRA. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc. (Hilfiger) (defendant), a successful designer and marketer of men’s clothing, decided to use ISCYRA’s “STAR CLASS” mark on a new nautical clothing line with details from competitive sailing. Hilfiger requested that its attorneys conduct a trademark screening search on the words “STAR CLASS” limited to federal trademarks in a clothing classification and did not reveal that the clothing line involved competitive sailing. The limited trademark search results revealed no identical registered or applied-for federal trademarks in clothing. Hilfiger’s attorneys advised running a comprehensive trademark search before using the words “STAR CLASS,” but Hilfiger did not broaden its trademark search before producing the nautical clothing line. ISCYRA filed suit under the Lanham Trade-Mark Act and claimed that Hilfiger infringed its trademark in the words “STAR CLASS.” Hilfiger ran a comprehensive trademark search and discovered ISCYRA’s trademark, but Hilfiger did not recall its merchandise from retailers. The district court granted ISCYRA’s application for a permanent injunction against Hilfiger’s use of the “STAR CLASS” mark in the nautical clothing line. However, the district court ruled that Hilfiger did not act in bad faith or willfully infringe the “STAR CLASS” trademark. The district court denied an accounting of profits and attorney’s fees as an award. ISCYRA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership