From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Interstate Specialty Marketing, Inc. v. ICRA Sapphire, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
158 Cal. Rptr. 3d 743 (2013)
Interstate Specialty Marketing, Inc. (Interstate) (plaintiff) contracted with ICRA Sapphire, Inc. (Sapphire) (defendant) to convert a computer-software application. Sapphire did not complete the conversion, and Interstate sued Sapphire for breach of contract. Interstate attached a November 14 or 15, 2002 letter to the complaint and alleged that it was a true and correct copy of the parties’ agreement. Sapphire filed a cross-complaint and attached the actual contract, dated November 26, 2002. However, Sapphire did not tell Interstate that the document attached to Interstate’s complaint was not the actual agreement. Instead, on March 22, 2012, Sapphire filed a summary-judgment motion based on Interstate’s reliance on the wrong document. On June 5, 2012, Interstate moved to amend its complaint to include the actual agreement. The trial court granted Interstate’s motion to amend and denied Sapphire’s motion for summary judgment. However, on its own motion, the trial court also set an order-to-show-cause hearing about possibly sanctioning Interstate for not attaching the correct agreement to the original complaint. Sapphire requested approximately $5,000 as reimbursement for fees it had spent to bring the summary-judgment motion based on Interstate’s mistake. The trial court awarded the fees to Sapphire as a sanction against Interstate under California Code of Civil Procedure § 128.7. Interstate appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bedsworth, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.