Iowa v. Tovar
United States Supreme Court
541 U.S. 77 (2004)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Tovar (defendant), representing himself, pled guilty. The Iowa Supreme Court reversed the conviction, holding that the U.S. Constitution mandated specific warnings to a defendant regarding the usefulness of counsel prior to him waiving his right to counsel. The Iowa Supreme Court held that because the trial court failed to give these warnings, Tovar’s waiver of right to counsel was invalid. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.