Iron Bar Holdings, LLC v. Cape
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
131 F.4th 1153 (2025)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Iron Bar Holdings, LLC (Iron Bar) (plaintiff) owned a large ranch in Wyoming that surrounded several checkerboard parcels of public land with prime elk hunting. To exclude anyone else from hunting on the public lands, Iron Bar installed posts and chains at some checkerboard corners to prevent a practice called corner crossing, which was a method of stepping diagonally across the corners from one public square to another. In 2020, Bradley Cape and two other hunters (collectively, the hunters) (defendants) hunted elk on the public-land squares. The hunters used a GPS-based map and corner crossing to travel to public squares that were completely surrounded by Iron Bar’s property. Although the hunters briefly passed through the airspace above Iron Bar’s property while doing this, they never touched the ground. Iron Bar representatives repeatedly confronted the hunters and told them to leave the public-land areas. Iron Bar also contacted local and federal law enforcement, but the agencies declined to take action. The next year, the hunters returned to the public hunting lands, this time using a ladder to avoid touching Iron Bar’s barriers or land. Iron Bar representatives again harassed the hunters and intentionally disrupted their hunting. Initially, law enforcement again declined to cite the hunters or ask them to leave. Eventually, Iron Bar convinced a local prosecutor to charge the hunters with criminal trespass. A jury later acquitted the hunters of the charge. Iron Bar then sued the hunters in federal court for civil trespass, seeking $9 million in damages. The district court ruled for the hunters, holding that corner crossing without touching or damaging private land was not trespass. Iron Bar appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tymkovich, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


