Iron Trade Products Co. v. Wilkoff Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
272 Pa. 172, 116 A. 150 (1922)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
Iron Trade Products Co. (Iron Trade) (plaintiff) contracted with Wilkoff Co. (Wilkoff) (defendant) to purchase relaying rails at $41 per ton. Iron Trade brought suit when Wilkoff did not deliver any of the rails, forcing Iron Trade to purchase the rails from another supplier for $49/ton. Iron Trade claimed as damages the difference between the market price at the time and place of delivery (allegedly $50/ton) and the contract price. Wilkoff claimed that Iron Trade’s subsequent purchases of rails rendered its performance under the contract impossible, as the announcement of such a large order drove up prices and reduced the supply of available rails to Wilkoff. The court ruled for Iron Trade. Wilkoff appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walling, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.