Iseberg v. Gross
Illinois Supreme Court
879 N.E.2d 278 (2007)
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
Iseberg (plaintiff), Slavin, and Gross (defendant) were business partners. After a business deal fell through, Slavin informed Gross multiple times that he wanted to harm Iseberg. Slavin even mentioned to Gross that he wished to kill Iseberg. Gross failed to warn Iseberg of Slavin’s threats, and Slavin shot Iseberg, causing him serious injury. Iseberg brought a negligence claim against Gross, claiming that Gross was obligated to warn Iseberg of Slavin’s threats. The trial court dismissed the claim, finding that Gross owed Iseberg no duty to warn. After Iseberg’s interlocutory appeal, the appellate court affirmed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burke, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.