J.A. Mennella Foods Corp. v. Neptune's Nuggets, Inc.

74 Misc. 2d 839, 346 N.Y.S.2d 43 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

J.A. Mennella Foods Corp. v. Neptune’s Nuggets, Inc.

New York County Court
74 Misc. 2d 839, 346 N.Y.S.2d 43 (1973)

Facts

J. A. Mennella Foods Corporation (Mennella) (plaintiff) sued Neptune’s Nuggets, Inc. (Neptune) and Matlaw’s Food Products, Inc. (Matlaw) (collectively, defendants) in county court in Suffolk County. Mennella’s complaint asserted two causes of action. The Suffolk County clerk issued a default judgment in Mennella’s favor in the amount of $11,836.82. Neptune and Matlaw moved to vacate the default judgment and dismiss the complaint, arguing that the county court did not have personal jurisdiction over them because they were not doing business in Suffolk County when Mennella commenced suit against them and because the judgment exceeded the county court’s $10,000 jurisdictional limit. Mennella responded that the county court had personal jurisdiction over Neptune and Matlaw pursuant to New York’s long-arm statute, Civil Procedure Law and Rules (CPLR) § 302 and that the county court’s jurisdictional limit was $20,000 in this case because Mennella asserted two causes of action (i.e., $10,000 per claim).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gates, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership