J. Nold v. Commission of the European Communities

1974 ECR 491, 2 CMLR 338 (14 May 1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

J. Nold v. Commission of the European Communities

European Union Court of Justice
1974 ECR 491, 2 CMLR 338 (14 May 1974)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

J. Nold (plaintiff) was a German limited partnership in the wholesale coal and construction materials business. The Commission of the European Communities (Commission) issued a decision that authorized new business and trading terms for the coal-supply sector. The changes prompted by the Commission’s decision led to a recession in coal production. Nold petitioned the European Union Court of Justice (EUCJ) to overturn the Commission’s decision, arguing that (1) the decision introduced restrictions that jeopardized Nold’s business development and profitability; and (2) the restrictions violated Nold’s right to free pursuit of business activity, as protected by international treaties, the German Constitution, and the constitutions of other European Union (EU) Member States.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pescatore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership