Jackson v. Abernathy
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
960 F.3d 94 (2020)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KC) (defendant) and Avanos Medical, Inc. (Avanos) (defendant) manufactured surgical gowns used by healthcare providers for treating patients with infectious diseases. Three employees of KC and Avanos alerted senior company executives, including KC’s Chief Executive Officer Thomas Falk and others (senior executives) (defendants), that the gowns had failed quality-control tests and encountered compliance issues. KC and Avanos told shareholders that the surgical gowns met the highest level of protection standards. Ronald Jackson (plaintiff) filed a securities-fraud class action, alleging that KC, Avanos, and the senior executives misled shareholders by misrepresenting the quality of the surgical gowns and ignoring the concerns raised by KC’s and Avanos’s employees. After the district court dismissed the case, Jackson motioned to set aside the dismissal and to amend the complaint. The district court denied Jackson’s motion. Jackson appealed. On appeal, Jackson abandoned the claims against the individual senior executives. Jackson only sought to resurrect the claims against KC and Avanos on the appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.