Jackson v. Virginia
United States Supreme Court
443 U.S. 307 (1979)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
Jackson (defendant) was convicted of first degree murder by a state trial judge. During trial, the prosecution had to establish that the murder was premeditated. The judge claimed to apply a reasonable-doubt standard in his assessment of the state’s case. The court of appeals upheld Jackson’s conviction. Jackson filed a federal habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction as based upon insufficient evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.