James v. Wormuth
Court of Appeals of New York
997 N.E.2d 133 (N.Y. 2013)
Dr. Wormuth (defendant) performed a lung biopsy on James (plaintiff). At some point during the procedure, the guide wire dislodged inside of James. Wormuth searched for the wire for 20 minutes but could not find it. At that point, Wormuth determined that it was in James’s best interest to end the biopsy with the wire still inside. James came back several weeks later and had the wire removed. James brought a medical malpractice suit against Wormuth on the theory that Wormuth was negligent when he intentionally left the wire inside of her. The trial court granted Wormuth a directed verdict, and the appellate court affirmed. James appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rivera, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.