Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
11 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 1993)
Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. (Janney) (plaintiff) contracted to serve as an advisor to The Underwood Group, Ltd. (Underwood), and all of Underwood’s subsidiaries, including Shepard Niles, Inc. (Shepard) (defendant). Janney brought suit against Underwood in state court and also brought this federal suit against Shepard for breach of contract, but did not join Underwood, the sole signatory of the contract, in the suit. Shepard filed a motion for judgment for failure to join an indispensable party. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted the motion, finding that a decision against Shepard in the case would have an improper negative effect on Underwood in Janney’s pending state action. Janney appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hutchinson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.