Janvey v. Alguire

647 F.3d 585 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Janvey v. Alguire

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
647 F.3d 585 (2011)

EP

Facts

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) initiated a lawsuit based on an alleged Ponzi scheme against Stanford Group Company (SGC) and Stanford International Bank. A preliminary injunction was granted to the court-appointed receiver to freeze assets of SGC agents and employees (employees) (defendants) pending resolution at trial. The employees filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in a promissory note entered with SGC. The district court upheld the receiver’s preliminary injunction before considering the employees’ motion to compel. The employees appealed, arguing that the court was precluded from granting the injunction with a pending motion to compel arbitration. The employees contended that the receiver’s claims regarding SGC were subject to arbitration by virtue of the promissory note and its application of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) rules. The receiver contended that the court properly granted the injunction to preserve the status quo despite the pending motion to compel.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Prado, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership