Jarrell v. Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
20 Vet. App. 326 (2006)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Denise Jarrell (plaintiff) served in the United States Navy from 1952 to 1954 and was treated for anxiety during her service. In 1956, the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) denied her claim for service-connected-disability benefits for a nervous condition. In 1997, Jarrell sought to have that decision revised on a theory of clear and unmistakable error (CUE). The VA denied the request, and Jarrell appealed. Her appeal came before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). In addition to the theory of CUE that had been made before the VA, Jarrell introduced for the first time to the board a new, second theory of CUE. The board acknowledged that Jarrell had raised a new theory of CUE, rejected both theories, and upheld the VA’s decision. Jarrell appealed, alleging that the board had erred in denying the new CUE theory.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kasold, J.)
Dissent (Hagel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.