Jefferson County v. M.C. Mosley

226 Mo. 2d 652 (1969)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jefferson County v. M.C. Mosley

Alabama Supreme Court
226 Mo. 2d 652 (1969)

Facts

In 1945, Dillard conveyed to Jefferson County (plaintiff) a right of way across his property but the country did not record its deed. A substantial portion of the easement overlapped already-existing Alton-Weems Road, which traversed Dillard’s property. In 1951 Dillard sold the property to Mosley (defendant) through a warranty deed, excepting “all public roads, or easements and rights of way” over the property. In 1952, Jefferson County recorded its deed for the right of way. Mosley then sold portions of the property to Peoples and to the Selfs (defendants). The Circuit Court of Jefferson County held that Mosley did not have actual or constructive notice of the county’s easement. Jefferson County appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lawson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership