Jefferson v. Missouri Baptist Medical Center

447 S.W.3d 701 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jefferson v. Missouri Baptist Medical Center

Missouri Court of Appeals
447 S.W.3d 701 (2014)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Eric Jefferson sued on behalf of his children, Collin and Courtney Jefferson (plaintiffs) alleging their mother Crystal’s cancer would have been treated two years earlier had radiologist Dr. Amy Mosher at Missouri Baptist Medical Center (MBMC) (defendants) not overlooked a suspicious mass. Another radiologist detected the mass along with fluid accumulation in 2005. A second study confirmed the mass and fluid were present. However, when Mosher read a third scan a month later, she reported the fluid had resolved without mentioning the mass was still there. Crystal thought the problem had resolved and did not seek treatment until she noticed pressure in her abdomen in 2008. By then, her cancer had reached stage IV and was inoperable, resulting in her death in 2011. The Jeffersons sued MBMC alleging Mosher was its employee. MBMC moved for summary judgment, claiming Mosher worked for a separate company called Midwest Radiology Associates that contracted with and paid Mosher and was not an MBMC employee. The trial court granted MBMC summary judgment. The Jeffersons appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Van Amburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership