Jenison v. Redfield
California Supreme Court
149 Cal. 500, 87 P. 62 (1906)
- Written by Oni Harton, JD
Facts
Jenison (plaintiff) brought an action for damages against Redfield (water-district directors) (defendant). Jenison received his apportionment of water from the district that would be used in the district without issue. Jenison also owned farmland outside the district that required irrigation. Jenison alleged that the water-district directors refused to distribute a portion of his allocated apportionment of the district’s water. When Jenison attempted to obtain the remaining allocation of his water for use outside of the district, the water district refused to provide Jenison with water. The water-district directors refused to acknowledge that Jenison was entitled to any allocation of the district’s water for use outside the district.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Angelloti, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.