Jensen v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
679 P.2d 903 (1984)
Dale Jensen died as a result of medical negligence on the part of a physician (defendant) employed by a hospital owned and operated by Intermountain Health Care, Inc. (Intermountain) (defendant). Jensen’s wife, Shirley (plaintiff), filed a medical malpractice suit against the physician and Intermountain. Prior to trial, Shirley settled with the defendant doctor and went to trial against Intermountain. After the trial, the jury returned a special verdict finding Dale 46 percent negligent in causing his own death, Intermountain 36 percent negligent, and the physician 18 percent negligent. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Shirley. Subsequently, the trial court set aside the original jury award and entered a judgment of no cause of action and dismissed the complaint. Shirley appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.