Jerez v. JD Closeouts, LLC
Nassau County District Court
943 N.Y.S.2d 392 (2012)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
JD Closeouts, LLC (JD) (defendant) was an online retailer. JD’s website contained an “About Us” webpage, which in turn contained a “Terms of Sale” webpage. The “Terms of Sale” webpage contained a forum-selection clause stating that any dispute arising from a transaction on the website would be adjudicated in Broward County, Florida. Guillermo Jerez (plaintiff) bought thousands of pairs of socks on JD’s website. When the socks arrived, Jerez found them to be defective. When JD refused to refund Jerez’s money, Jerez brought suit. Jerez was a resident of Nassau County, New York, and he filed the suit in Nassau County District Court. JD filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the forum-selection clause on the website was binding, and Nassau County was not the proper forum. Jerez argued that he never saw the forum-selection clause on the website, and JD never specifically brought the clause to his attention.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ciaffa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.