John Davis v. William Balson

461 F. Supp. 842 (1978)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John Davis v. William Balson

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
461 F. Supp. 842 (1978)

Facts

A class-action suit was filed by John Davis (plaintiff) against William Balson, superintendent of Lima State Hospital (LSH), on behalf of all individuals civilly or criminally committed at LSH on or after May 23, 1973. Davis sought injunctive and declaratory relief, arguing that LSH violated patients’ constitutional rights by forcing patients to work and not paying the federal minimum wage. While confined at LSH, patients were responsible for personal housekeeping and maintenance tasks. Additional work assignments were based solely on administrative convenience. Davis argued that the work was counter-therapeutic and that payment was therapeutically required to ensure that patients maintained a positive attitude towards their work. Patients who were employed worked an average of four to eight hours a day and were paid $10.00 to $15.00 a month. In addition, Davis argued that both civilly and criminally committed patients were entitled to due process prior to being moved to more restrictive environments or being sanctioned due to their behavior.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walinski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership